On 02/24/2012 07:38, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:54:32PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>
>> In message <4f46bfdf.3070...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes:
>>>
>>> 2782 was published 12 years ago this month. I suppose it can be
>>> considered mature enough to deploy at this point? :)
>>
>> +1000
>
> Over in spfbis, people are arguing that the SPF RRTYPE should be
> deprecated and abandoned in SPF because nobody uses it because of
> practical difficulties in getting new RRTYPEs deployed. What makes us
> think that the arguments in favour of SRV are going to find more
> fertile ground?
Because I emphasized the point that SRV has been around for 12 years? I
have enough experience to know how difficult it is to deploy new RRs.
SRV is not new.
Doug
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
