On 6/15/12 14:42 , [email protected] wrote: > I presume it is the same data that people input into the "Organization" field > when they register for the meeting.
I do change mine based on what capacity I'm attending a particular meeting in. That goes for email address on existing blue sheets as well... The nice people who send me a check every two weeks don't generally fund my attendance. > Regards, > > Ed J. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Burger <[email protected]> > Sender: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:37:50 > To: IETF Chair<[email protected]> > Cc: IETF<[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets > > Do we have guidelines as to what is an "organization affiliation"? > > On Jun 14, 2012, at 5:26 PM, IETF Chair wrote: > >> Two things have occurred since the message below as sent to the IETF mail >> list. First, we got a lawyer in Europe to do some investigation, and the >> inclusion of the email address on the blue sheet will lead to trouble with >> the European privacy laws. Second, Ted Hardie suggested that we could >> require a password to access the scanned blue sheet. >> >> Based on the European privacy law information, the use of email will result >> in a major burden. If the email address is used, then we must provide a way >> for people to ask for their email address to be remove at any time in the >> future, even if we got prior approval to include it. Therefore, I suggest >> that we collect organization affiliation to discriminate between multiple >> people with the same name instead of email address. >> >> Based on Ted's suggestion, I checked with the Secretariat about using a >> datatracker login to download the scanned blue sheet. This is fairly easy >> to do, once the community tracking tools are deployed. However, with the >> removal of the email addresses from the blue sheets, it is unclear that >> there is any further need for password protection of these images. >> Therefore, I suggest that we proceed without password protection for the >> blue sheet images. >> >> Here is a summary of the suggested way forward: >> >> - Stop collecting email addresses on blue sheets; >> >> - Collect organization affiliation to discriminate between multiple people >> with the same name; >> >> - Scan the blue sheets and include the images in the proceedings for the WG >> session; >> >> - Add indication to top of the blue sheet so people know it will be part of >> the proceedings; and >> >> - Discard paper blue sheets after scanning. >> >> Russ >> >> >> On May 6, 2012, at 12:46 PM, IETF Chair wrote: >> >>> We have heard from many community participants, and consensus is quite >>> rough on this topic. The IESG discussed this thread and reached two >>> conclusions: >>> >>> (1) Rough consensus: an open and transparent standards process is more >>> important to the IETF than privacy of blue sheet information. >>> >>> (2) Rough consensus: inclusion of email addresses is a good way to >>> distinguish participants with the same or similar names. >>> >>> >>> Based on these conclusions, the plan is to handle blue sheets as follows: >>> >>> - Continue to collect email addresses on blue sheets; >>> >>> - Scan the blue sheet and include the image in the proceedings for the WG >>> session; >>> >>> - Add indication to top of the blue sheet so people know it will be part of >>> the proceedings; and >>> >>> - Discard paper blue sheets after scanning. >>> >>> >>> On behalf of the IESG, >>> Russ >>> >> > >
