Hi again Martin, On 06/26/2012 12:11 PM, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: > So the question is really, what's the use case, and what's just a > consequence of that use case. If confirmation of already available > resources (e.g. like a fingerprint) is the (main?) use case, and the > greater weight on "speakability" just a design consequence, then it > makes sense to have two separate things.
Yes, confirmation is the main current use-case for nih as I understand it and have said previously. (Of course the resource might not yet be present, so "already available" isn't quite right, but that's a nit.) Have we beaten this to death sufficiently now? I hope so;-) If you want to suggest a sentence that says that, feel free. Stephen.
