So I'm confused... We're we talking about the possibility of sticking to one European city, one north American city and one Asian city and not picking various cities throughout the world.
I was just suggesting picking -a- city in Europe that was not multiple hops from most US hubs. Prague, while a nice city, isn't one hop and as Dave pointed out this adds costs and time, just as would choosing a US city that is multiple hops from major European hubs. I loved Vancouver and would go back there over and over again. I like Minneapolis for convenience and venue and would go there every time. I liked Prague, both times, but had trouble getting there both times and it did add time and cost. Geoff On Aug 8, 2012, at 1:06 PM, Ole Jacobsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Geoff, > > What are you talking about? Of course we are "considering" all of > those places. We are going to London in 2014 for example, we went to > Paris this year. But, like with all popular places, finding venues > available for OUR dates is not easy. Add to that the costs and you > will understand why we don't meet in London or Paris or Frankfurt or > Amsterdam more often. > > Ole > > > Ole J. Jacobsen > Editor and Publisher, The Internet Protocol Journal > Cisco Systems > Tel: +1 408-527-8972 Mobile: +1 415-370-4628 > E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj > Skype: organdemo > > > On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Geoff Mulligan wrote: > >> So then why not consider, London, Paris (not the Concorde >> Lafayette), Frankfurt, Amsterdam? >>
