On 27/02/2013 09:28, Brian Trammell wrote: > On Feb 27, 2013, at 10:20 AM, Tim Chown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 26 Feb 2013, at 20:28, Martin Rex <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I have a recurring remote participation problem with the >>> IETF Meeting Agendas, because it specifies the time of WG meeting slots >>> in local time (local to the IETF Meeting), but does not give the >>> local time zone *anywhere*. >>> >>> I would appreciate if the local time zone indication would be added >>> like somewhere at the top of the page, to each IETF meeting agenda. >> So in this interesting discussion of UTC, Martin has actually made an >> excellent point. Having UTC listings for the agenda would be very helpful, >> or an alternative agenda showing UTC. > > +1. Given our high remote participation, I put UTC in the agenda for the MILE > WG anyway (usually correctly, even). And given that the IETF often meets on > one side or another of the DST change in local time, having an unchanging > time reference would be helpful even for attendees.
UTC time *and* date please, for people in whichever hemisphere happens to be opposite the IETF. Brian
