On Mar 3, 2013, at 13:37, Eric Burger <[email protected]> wrote: > There are two other interpretations of this situation, neither of which I > think is true, but we should consider the possibility. The first is the TSV > is too narrow a field to support an area director and as such should be > folded in with another area. The second is if all of the qualified people > have moved on and no one is interested in building the expertise the IESG > feels is lacking, then industry and academia have voted with their feet: the > TSV is irrelevant and should be closed. > > Since I believe neither is the case, it sounds like the IESG requirements are > too tight.
I don't believe the requirements are too tight. *Someone* one the IESG needs to understand congestion control. The likely possibility is that many qualified people failed to get sufficient employer support to be able to volunteer. It's at least a 50% time committment. Lars
