The 50% time commitment is an IESG-imposed requirement. If that is really the problem, we have had areas with more than two ADs.
On Mar 3, 2013, at 7:50 AM, "Eggert, Lars" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 3, 2013, at 13:37, Eric Burger <[email protected]> wrote: >> There are two other interpretations of this situation, neither of which I >> think is true, but we should consider the possibility. The first is the TSV >> is too narrow a field to support an area director and as such should be >> folded in with another area. The second is if all of the qualified people >> have moved on and no one is interested in building the expertise the IESG >> feels is lacking, then industry and academia have voted with their feet: the >> TSV is irrelevant and should be closed. >> >> Since I believe neither is the case, it sounds like the IESG requirements >> are too tight. > > I don't believe the requirements are too tight. *Someone* one the IESG needs > to understand congestion control. > > The likely possibility is that many qualified people failed to get sufficient > employer support to be able to volunteer. It's at least a 50% time > committment. > > Lars
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
