On Friday, May 03, 2013 12:04:53 PM Douglas Otis wrote: ... > Over many years at attempting to change the course of the SPF process, this > effort appears to have been futile. ...
It does seem a bit odd for you to claim you're being ignored when the largest change in SPF processing limits contained in 4408bis was your suggestion. An alternate interpretation to consider is that the working group fully considered your inputs and incorporated those that were appropriate technically and in scope for the charter. Scott K
