On May 4, 2013, at 10:26 PM, joel jaeggli <joe...@bogus.com> wrote: >> However, that is a bit of a problem, because I think it's fairly rare for >> documents to get additional "review" at last call time. Changing the name >> probably won't fix that. > It feels like unless something is particularly controversial that the > likelihood of it getting useful review other than solicited ones during last > call has actually gone down. If it's fully cooked, and sometime it seems that > they aren't, that lack of commentary does not indicate consensus or > readiness in particular.
By "last call time" I was referring to IETF last call, not WGLC. I am painfully familiar with "we'll do a WGLC to see if we can get some review."
