On Sep 9, 2013, at 4:27 PM, Steve Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually, I interpret the chemistry professor's comment in a different light. > It would be possible to design a system where: > > o the standard end user software doesn't facilitate editing the other > person's text, and > > o each piece of text is signed. > > The result would be a system where a recipient would know whether the person > who is alleged to have written a piece of the message actually did so, and > the normal mode of use would be to leave things untouched. Or, if you edit > someone else's text, it immediately becomes your text.
That's what I assumed Brian was implying, yes. :)
