On Monday, September 09, 2013 21:36:15 John Levine wrote: > >> Yes, they should have made that impossible. > > > >Oh my, I _love_ this! This is actually the first non-covert use case I've > >heard described, although I'm not convinced that PGP could actually do > >this without message format tweaks. > Sounds like we're on our way to reinventing S/MIME. Other than the > key signing and distribution (which I agree is a major can of worms) > it works remarkably well.
Which sounds kind of like, "Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?" Scott K
