On Saturday 12 June 2004 17:34, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 03:12:01PM +0300, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
> > Anyone feels like answering?
>
> [ snip ]
>
> answered.
>
> Next issue: FAQ
>
> faqomatic seems like a very nice system, but aparantly not much
> developed any more.
>
Is there's anything that bothers us with faqomatic that makes it inadequate
for our needs? Does faqomatic has bugs that are not planned to be resolved?
If faqomatic is adequate for our FAQ, then I say we stay with it. A program
does not need to be constantly improved and embellished so it will continue
to remain useful. There's a difference between inactive and unusable.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://shlomif.il.eu.org/
Knuth is not God! It took him two days to build the Roman Empire.
