On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Gaurav Paliwal
<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I forgot to ask Alok if he uses https option in gmail. In fact, I took
>> https for granted in Alok's preferences.
>>

Few points.

1. Gmail (as Gaurav pointed out) by default uses https and NOT http.
This change was brought a few months back?

2. It is unlikely that anything inside IIT was compromised. If it was
from within IIT, the attacker was probably smart enough to access his
gmail account via proxy.

3. The content of the email that was sent out can hint on whether it
was from within IIT or not.

4. Alok could have accessed his gmail account from a compromised
machine which had spyware collecting usernames/passwords.

5. If you talk about general email (gmail) security, a nice attack
vector could be potentially attacking all those linkedin kind services
where people willingly divulge their passwords (and hope they are not
being recorded).

6. Hosting your email account at a third-party IMHO does not make it
particularly safe. For example, GoDaddy, a popular domain name hosting
service was recently compromised (google for the news). In the past, I
have also been a victim of such attacks on registered domains (that
was a hosting domain though).

7. I don't understand what is so strange about not finding lots of
encryption standards to choose from in gmail settings. It would be
strange if all other "free" email services offered it and gmail did
not. You probably have too high an expectation from google.

8. @Mohit, can you explain why DoS may somehow deregulation at the
databases and how/if they would reveal passwords? (I don't understand
what you are trying to say there :P)

9. https is also prone to vulnerabilities and if you browse for news
in the past 6 months, I am sure I read something about that.

Just my 2 cents.


SB

-- 
l...@iitd - http://tinyurl.com/ycueutm

Reply via email to