On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:38 PM, sunil datta <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Feb 16, 9:39 pm, satyaakam goswami <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Narendra Sisodiya < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > blog - > > >http://lug-iitd.posterous.com/aicte-refused-to-give-details-of-mou-be. > .. > > > > can we file one more RTI asking with reference to the letter from MHRD > > stating on one hand they are saying in larger public interest and this > > details of MOU between Microsoft and Autodesk are indeed important to > know > > in the interest of public , let us meetup with SFLC with all the details > we > > have so far when is it possible for you ,were you able to place a call > today > > ? > > > > -Satya > > yes, but careful drafting of RTI application is required. I think a > lawyer should be consulted. > > I don't think asking for MOU will help in this regard firstly because > one will have to fight a battle to prove larger public interest to get > a copy of MOU , AICTE is not a private entity, We must have a copy of MoU to get full details. AICTE should not hide these documents. Most important things is - "they are hiding some info (MoU), MoU must be having something sercet which they do not want to be made public" > secondly, MOU is not the right document. As you said > "can we file one more RTI asking with reference to the letter from > MHRD" is the right point. I will like to put some points: > 1) Why were MHRD recommendations not taken into consideration. > MHRD recommendations were came this month, I filed RTI this 2-3 month back. > 2) Name of the committee members and their experience in propritory > and open source software and the time spend by the committee to > decide ............. > 3) What advantages were seen in propritory and what were the > disadvantages on open source software because of which propritory > software was chosen. > 4) What studies were made and the details of the experts in open > source software who were consulted before reach to the conclusion that > propitiatory software are the best. > > I have just posted some points, not properly drafted, but will help > you on how to trap those guys. I have just reached Delhi and a bit > tired, and I am sure you can easily find mistakes, so, if you find any > mistake just correct yourself. > > If anyone want, I can try to get this properly drafted. > > I think RTI is the cheapest tool and the most efficient one to trap > them. As per my experience [in Distt Courts] it will not be wise to > file a case. > > Sunil Datta > www.opensourcenuts.com > > -- > LUG@IITD - http://tinyurl.com/ycueutm > -- ┌─────────────────────────┐ │ Narendra Sisodiya │ http://narendrasisodiya.com └─────────────────────────┘ -- LUG@IITD - http://tinyurl.com/ycueutm
