On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:26 AM, satyaakam goswami <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Sanat Sarangi > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Satya. The good point is moving beyond just Linux to encompass the >> entire gamut of open source tools out there. It does not harm if the >> name of a group reflects its philosophy. And for posting rules, if I >> remember correctly we have already been rightly advised in this forum >> that top-posting reverses the flow of conversation making it a bit >> incomprehensible. Please correct if I am wrong. >> > > this is much better post wise and content wise , the point is we are not > talking about this group the op has asked for something more deep with org > structure , what is there in a name every one has a freedom to give a name > to whatever they want . It was just a suggestion.. I will defiantly follow this convention.. and I will try to create Good number of "Open Technology User Group" If others are feeling good... that is a good sign.. PS: I am not talking about restructuring lug-iitd .. untill and unless they get along and work it does not matter in the name i > suppose . Since your work will create the identity as a collective and yes > that is the good point of being in the community i feel. > > -Satya -- LUG@IITD - http://lug-iitd.org/Footer
