On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 15:28 +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: > > Yes, my response was to the idea of creating subsequent groups (not > >> renaming this group) with this broader coverage of open source > applications. > >> Of course whether that will camouflage the importance of Linux > given the > >> impression people already have about LUG groups is debatable. And > both > >> groups can always co-exist with their respective mandates. > >> > > > > again you are bottom posting :-( , > > > > > Bottom Posting is not bad.. people now a day stopped mailing to the > group > because of the the counter-arguments..
in ILUGCBE, which is a new LUG with most members raw newbies, we do not have rules at all - anyone can post any way they want. We will bring up the rules later when the list grows. If you feel that enforcement of rules is hindering the growth of this group, the best thing to do is not to have rules. You cannot have your cake and eat it ;-). I am a member of many lists - many of them do not have rules, so I do nothing. But if you *have* rules everyone *must* follow them. It is up to you to decide. -- regards KG http://lawgon.livejournal.com Coimbatore LUG rox http://ilugcbe.techstud.org/ -- LUG@IITD - http://lug-iitd.org/Footer
