On Thursday 03 January 2013 09:36 AM, satyaakam goswami wrote: > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:50 AM, gajendra khanna > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I am sure the Government will allow other IDs also. I don't see why after >> spending crores and crores on it, government shouldn't make it one of the >> options. >> > > The whole debate is about the way its being done in a rush , there are lots > of theories and points and counterpoints floating around . i generally > follow a group on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/nouid/ , where > most of the activist are already there , Yeah the 'rush' is surprising because in a country like ours, where the it takes years to implement even a good law after it is passed in the parliament e.g. RTI but when something gets implemented even before the bill is discussed in parliament, it has to be opposed because it is unconstitutional and the reason is the push from the MNCs which want our citizens' data at any cost, so that they can make trillions of money from the Indian population and for this Mr. Nandan Nilekani has become their agent.
If you want to know more about this project and its 'real' intentions go have a look at[1] , there are thousand of articles read them until you get satisfied, that yes "Aadhar" is "NIRAadhar". > i know Parin would not like to > join it though :-) yeah I didn't because, IMHO Facebook is THE place to give away your privacy and one of the main reason to oppose UID is Privacy only, so for me joining it would be contradictory but now a lot of time has been wasted, would have to join Facebook for that group and try to bring all of them to Diaspora, or some mailing list! [1] http://aadhararticles.blogspot.com -- Thanks & Regards Parin Sharma http://identi.ca/FOSSmaniac -- -- Mailing list guidelines and other related articles: http://lug-iitd.org/Footer
