On Dec 9, 9:49 pm, Abdulaziz Ghuloum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there any good arguments for keeping ".ss" and ".scm" > for library file names?
I cannot think of any good argument. Of course, that means that if other R6RS implementations keep using .ss and .scm as valid library extensions, then porting to Ikarus will require renaming the extension. This is a very minor disadvantages however, compared to the advantages of having a single extension (I hate when PLT uses .ss for libraries, since I never know if I am supposed to run the file or to import it).
