On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Yoshikatsu Fujita <[email protected]> wrote: > Now, I understand it is not common, I will change the current > descriptions('implicitly phased' and/or 'implicit-phased') to > something like 'phase-less'. And of course, I'm going to study > 'implicit phasing'. ;-)
Please, don't change the name. Phase-less would be even more confusing as it means another thing (see the section of http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=255303 where I talk about the Guile). Perhaps Aziz can suggest a better name; to me Ypsilon is using implicit phasing, it just lacks the import-on-demand semantics of Ikarus, but this is visible to the user only in rare situations; I have even argued in favore of the Ypsilon model.
