On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Derick Eddington <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 10:21 +0200, Michele Simionato wrote: >> I would be fine if having multiple libraries in the same >> file would be restricted to scripts (.ss extension). If a library is intended >> to be of general use it can be extracted from the script and >> put in its own file later on. Conversely, multiple libraries could >> be packed together and the application shipped as a single script. > > This is still possible. It is orthogonal to my SRFI proposal. Scheme > systems will still be free to install libraries from the same file as a > script (or from anywhere else) instead of using the file name resolving.
Do you know which implementations (if any) provide the "libraries inside script" feature already?
