On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Raja Guha wrote:

>   Reeeally convinced, were you? not me either! nor Linus!
> nor any but RHS and a few(very few) camp-followers :).


  It is RMS (Richard M. Stallman - http://www.stallman.org/ ), and those
who agree with him are not 'few'.  I will be meeting him in person for the
first time next week, and I am looking forward to this.  We have written
each other many times over the last 10+ years.

  I will be on a panel titled "Open Source vs Free Software":
http://weblog.flora.org/article.php3?story_id=253


  I did need to disagree with him on the GNU/Linux terminology recently.  
The Linux Community, the Open Source Community, and the Free Software
community are three different communities.  There is a considerable amount
of overlap, but they are not the same.

  I am primarily part of the Free Software community, and use Linux not 
because I believe it is the best OS but because I believe it is the best 
Copyleft OS.

> Open Source is about source sharing - NOT about doctrinare beliefs thereof.

  When the term "Open Source" was first coined by some members of the Free
Software community, it was about avoiding the confusing word 'free' in the
english language.  The phrase "free as in free speech, not free beer" was
simply not being understood.

  It grew into a separate community after the term was coined.  It is only
now that much of the Free Software community is joining RMS in not
substituting the phrase "Open Source" for "Free Software" when it really
is Free Software we are talking about.

  I will be talking to members of parliament this afternoon and tomorrow, 
and it is Free Software that I will be talking about.  I will likely be 
using my slides from my recent OCLUG presentation:
  http://weblog.flora.org/article.php3?story_id=248


  Some europeans have started to use the phrase "Software Libre" to
separate from the confusion with Software Gratis (or Freeware, etc).

> RHS is to be respected for being the original author of the BEST 
> existing compiler, free or otherwise as well as several other such 
> creations - not because of the endless 'free' vs 'open' debates that he 
> has generated and continues to fuel.

  I hope I am remembered for my fight for software and other freedoms, not
for any silly piece of software I happened to write.  Software isn't
interesting except for what you can do with it.  I am a firm believer that
software should only ever be thought of as having 'use value', not value
in its own existance.

---
 Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://www.flora.ca/>
 See http://weblog.flora.ca/ for announcements, activities, and opinions
 Submission to Innovation Strategy         | No2Violence in Politics
 http://www.flora.ca/innovation-2002.shtml | http://www.no-dot.ca/


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
"unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/help/faq_list.html

Reply via email to