On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:

> dear russell,
> somehow the massive walmart or dell -like PC makers are absent in the
> country.

  Please don't accept that as a bad thing.  There is "unity in diversity",
and you do not want the 'one size fits all' type attitude that is
prevalent here in North America.  There are extremely rare cases when the
centralization *seems* beneficial, but normally it is a considerable
disadvantage.  The Walmart and Dell's of the world have always been
trivial corruption targets by various special interests.


  Remember: The number of instances of bribery and corruption in India
(IE: when dealing with government) may be higher, but with the
centralization of power on this side of the big-drink the numbers may be
lower but the scale of each is considerably higher (and more hidden).

> But given the scenario over here, i doubt even box assemblers will be
> able to get people interested in it.

  I do believe that Microsoft is helping us here here.  Anything that is
done to cut down on the illegal copying of the software of Software
Manufacturing, the more people will realize all the advantages of FLOSS.

  On the other hand, they are using obviously bogus statistics to try to 
prove their point.  Have you read some of the reports on the BSA "Piracy" 
studies?

---cut---
http://www.flora.ca/russell/drafts/consumer-license-study.html

Consumer license study: software "piracy", free software, and economic 
impacts

Summary

The Business Software Alliance (BSA) produces a yearly North American 
Software Piracy Study. The Canadian Alliance Against Software Theft 
(CAAST) then sends out media releases into the Canadian market, as well as 
lobbying the Government of Canada, based on these studies.

These studies have critical flaws due to the fact that they are focused 
entirely on the perspective of the vendors who are members of the 
alliance. Two areas are of particular concern:

* Their methodology does not differentiate between reasons why member 
software are not being purchased. Most critical is the fact that users 
switching to Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) or other 
alternatives to their software are not differentiated from illegal copying 
of member software.


...etc...
---cut---


> By the way [i realise that on a Linux list this is inflammable], do you
> notice that with the release after release of Windows versions and flavors,
> the free/share toolsets-suites-utilities for Win9x are slowly drying up.

  FreeWare/ShareWare was always doomed to die as it is attacked from both
sides.  As a way of distributing proprietary software, it simply cannot
compete with FLOSS nor with the large monopoly channels that exist with
the dominant proprietary vendors.

  My perception is that FreeWare/ShareWare served a very temporary need 
while FLOSS on legacy platforms became popular.  You can now see CD's such 
as http://www.theopencd.org/ which are all FLOSS where CD's like this in 
the past would be FreeWare/ShareWare.

> It is like your valve radio set days. One day those users will have to
> migrate to higher platforms or be isolated... Shocking thought

  The amount of FLOSS for Win 9x/ME is increasing, and I expect as the
number of proprietary vendors that drop this platform that this will
continue.

  I suspect that this will be of benefit to us in the long term. People
who want to upgrade their applications without learning a new OS will be
moving to FLOSS... and their next OS upgrade would then be more likely to
be a FLOSS OS.

  They need to know that they have a choice -- and I do hope that even
though this is a "Linux" users group that promoting FLOSS on legacy
platforms (Microsoft, Apple, etc) will also be part of your work.

---
 Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://www.flora.ca/>
 Any 'hardware assist' for communications, whether it be eye-glasses, 
 VCR's, or personal computers, must be under the control of the citizen 
 and not a third party.   -- http://www.flora.ca/russell/


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
"unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3

Reply via email to