On 12 Jan 2003, Sumeet Madhukar Moghe wrote:

> On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 05:34, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> > Take out FreeBSD references !! Linux alone should suffice...
> Why not..? we support FLOSS in all forms.

Just remember -- this is an ongoing conversation in most LUG's.  Some take 
the "L" literally and say that if the Linux kernel isn't involved, then 
they aren't interested.

> BSD is possibly the most lenient Free Licensing scheme. He aint
> referring to M$ is he...its just BSD.

BTW:  When discussing licenses, you may want to check out the draft I 
started here.  BSD is the most popular non-Copyleft Free Software license, 
and the GPL is the most popular Copyleft Free Software license.  I happen 
to believe that more obligation to share makes a license better, but it is 
important to realize that different people have different motivations.


http://www.flora.ca/russell/drafts/license.html

---cut---

   Using public domain as a center point, we will try to create a
   one-dimensional line where the positive direction involves more
   obligations to share and the negative direction involves more
   obligations not to share.

   It needs to be recognized that this is a considerable simplification
   of software licensing given that some license agreements can be very
   complex, and software may be licensed under more than one license
   agreement at the same time. While FLOSS tends to large numbers of
   software packages sharing identical licenses, proprietary software
   tends to have different licenses for different version of the same
   piece of software.


 source                                           non-Copyleft  Copyleft
 under   typical        Freeware  Public          Free          Free
 NDA     proprietary  Shareware   Domain          Software      Software
 +-------+------------+-+---------+---------------+-------------+
 -                                0                             +

---cut---



> /Sumeet
---
 Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://www.flora.ca/>
 Any 'hardware assist' for communications, whether it be eye-glasses, 
 VCR's, or personal computers, must be under the control of the citizen 
 and not a third party.   -- http://www.flora.ca/russell/


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
"unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3

Reply via email to