Hi 

On Apr 4, 2005 12:53 PM, J.Bakshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 04 Apr 2005 3:07 pm, GLOWFRIEND wrote:
> > Hi,
> > infact I can say comparing Reiserfs and Ext3... Reiserfs complies more
> > towards posix acls and its faster for smaller files and multiple
> > recursive directories. Even for large Files its quite fast... but in
> > case you are planning to store file more than 1 GB with a huge Hard
> > disk I would recommend ext3...
> >
> > regards
> 
> I have 4.3 GB HDD and no file having a size > or = 1GB.
> but I have noticed a warning message during the booting says
> *DMA is turned off* . long before in Redhat6.2 I enabled the DMA option during
> kernel compilation and booting from that build kernel displayed some error
> messages with IDE reseting . since then I have never activated DMA . is there
> any command to enable the IDE DMA to just check whether it will work or not ?

man hdparm
http://packages.debian.org/testing/admin/hdparm

-siddhartha

> 
> thanks for ur response.
> 
> >
> > On Apr 4, 2005 3:12 AM, Siddhartha Basu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Apr 2, 2005 12:27 PM, J.Bakshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > could anyone pls tell me whether  reiserfs file system slows down the
> > > > machine ( than the ext3 on that particular machine ) ?
> > >
> > > I have used both and still using both of them in different partitions
> > > of my hard drive.
> > > I haven't felt any kind of slowdown because of reiserfs.
> > > Though haven't tested it yet, reiserfs4(bleeding edge version, not
> > > includeded in the main kernel tree yet) boast to be the fastest
> > > filesystem with cfq/anticipatory io scheduler combo.
> > >
> > >
> > > if yes then how can one change
> > >
> > > > reiserfs to ext3 ?
> > >
> > > Backup your data and then
> > > reformat the partition using reiserfs filesystem specific
> > > userland tools. Be sure to compile the kernel with filesystem support
> > > first.
> > >
> > > >some technical discussion between reiserfs and ext3 is
> > > > also welcome.
> > >
> > > These are some links with benchmarks
> > > http://fsbench.netnation.com/
> > > http://www.ephess.net/fs/linux-2.4.html
> > >
> > > -siddhartha
> > >
> > > > thanks in advanced.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >  ___________
> > > > ( debian!!! )
> > > >  -----------
> > > >    o
> > > >     o
> > > >         .--.
> > > >
> > > >        |o_o |
> > > >        |
> > > >        |:_/ |
> > > >
> > > >       //   \ \
> > > >      (|     | )
> > > >     /'\_   _/`\
> > > >     \___)=(___/
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
> > > > "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
> > > > FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
> > > "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
> > > FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3
> 
> --
>  ___________
> ( debian!!! )
>  -----------
>    o
>     o
>         .--.
>        |o_o |
>        |:_/ |
>       //   \ \
>      (|     | )
>     /'\_   _/`\
>     \___)=(___/
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
> "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
> FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3
>

--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
"unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3

Reply via email to