On 9/19/05, Sankarshan Mukhopadhay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > third point .. the recent offer by a member to offer premises > > evokes NO response from listadmin .. who was clamouring > > that password is not needed for meetings, etc > > Why is the ListAdmin required to respond ? Go ahead and take up the > offer - if that turns out to be the best step then people will anyway > populate the LUG/that LUG. Survival of the noisiest to paraphrase Darwin.
Sankarshan and others, The ListAdmin (can we start calling him Indranil now? :-) is certainly not required to respond.The "LUG" is, (whoever or whatever it is) if it believes that meetings are necessary and a lack of premises is what prevents the meetings from being held. Also, sorry for the nit-picking, but when you say: "populate the LUG/that LUG." I just want to point out that there's no "that LUG". As for "this LUG", it is an elusive entity because no one seems to be able to speak for it. (The one concrete entity is the List Admin - as evidenced by the mails and action from him). You also say " take up the offer - if that turns out to be the best step ...". I'm sure you don't believe that having LUG meetings may not be the right step? Also, to clarify, when I made that offer of premises, it was to ILUG-Cal of which I believe I am a member by virtue of being on the mailing list (and not to any other LUG). Will the real ILUG-Cal speak up and get rid of all the confusion? Prashant Verma -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line. FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3
