On 21 May 2010 20:09, Visakh <gokulda...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On May 20, 10:15 pm, Mohamed Naufal <naufa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Something for the technically minded: >> The first in-depth technical analysis of VP8 >> (http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=377) >> >> Cheers >> Naufal > > > Thanks a lot for the link. Unfortunately, this article is not very > confidence inspiring. It seems to suggest that VP8 is inferior to H. > 264 and that it is a patent bomb. Anyway, the truth will be known > soon. Meanwhile, Google's silence about VP8 - even during its release- > is very unnerving. >
Take a look at this: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/21/mpegla_mulls_patent_license_for_webm/ Regards -- "Freedom is the only law". "Freedom Unplugged" http://www.ilug-tvm.org You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ilug-tvm" group. To control your subscription visit http://groups.google.co.in/group/ilug-tvm/subscribe To post to this group, send email to ilug-tvm@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ilug-tvm-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For details visit the google group page: http://groups.google.com/group/ilug-tvm?hl=en
