On 30-Jun-08, at 2:00 PM, Anoop John wrote:

wikipedia is not meant for advertisement - please remove this and add a

But isn't ilug-chennai a notably significant entity that deserves to
be on Wikipedia? I am not talking about advertising but as
encyclopedic content on how Foss evolved in India.

point is that wikipedia is *not* an encyclopedia - everything mentioned in wikipedia *has* to be referenced from original source material. So you can only talk about ILUGC in wikipedia if you can present external references to ILUGC - as far as I know, there are none apart from the ILUGC website. So let us work to make ILUGC famous, and then it will naturally come into wikipedia

ILUG Delhi is on
there, BLUG Banglore is on there, Shouldn't ILUGC be there too? I did
go through the policies and felt ILUGC should go in there.

just because other people break the policies of wikipedia, it does not mean that we should do so. As for the BLUG page, it is a disgrace as it has been put there to further the interests of one individual (also the foss.in page and the atul chitnis page). Please go through the discussions on these pages - older discussions as everyone has got fed up with discussing them and no longer does so. You will note that all the references in these three articles are to the website or to press statements given by the organisations involved.



paragraph in the foss in India page

Which page, could you please pass on the URL.?

put it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_India <------- but even this does not have proper references.

--

regards
kg
http://lawgon.livejournal.com
http://nrcfosshelpline.in/code/



_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe <password> <address>" in the subject or body of the message. http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc

Reply via email to