Typo sorry. That was 20 mins, not 2009 mins. Raja
On 27/01/2009, Raja Subramanian <rajasuper...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry for the top post. > > > I suspended to RAM my thinkpad for a year - even when I carried it > around in the laptop bag. After 1 year, the battery life dropped to > just 2009 mins. > > I had the same experience on a dell earlier. > > I'm currently hibernating andd powering off and there are no problems. > > Imo, suspend to RAM is not worth it in the long run. > > Raja > > > On 27/01/2009, Kumar Appaiah <a.ku...@alumni.iitm.ac.in> wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: >>> [*] Not to be confused with suspend-to-ram which is mostly only for >>> laptops and even there is perhaps invoked only after some >>> superstitious invocations. >> >> JFTR, I have been suspending to RAM (while leaving a laptop connected >> to power supply most of the time) with no problems whatsoever, ever >> since kernel 2.6.27. It's much, much quicker than suspend to disk, >> though it does draw a tiny bit of battery if you don't connect the >> power supply. >> >> Kumar >> -- >> Kumar Appaiah >> _______________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe, email ilugc-requ...@ae.iitm.ac.in with >> "unsubscribe <password> <address>" >> in the subject or body of the message. >> http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc >> > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, email ilugc-requ...@ae.iitm.ac.in with "unsubscribe <password> <address>" in the subject or body of the message. http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
