Hello,

2009/3/2 Kapil Hari Paranjape <[email protected]>:
> You probably used tabs instead of spaces! As it turns out it may not
> matter.

Actually no. I used white space only. But Gmail wrapped the text and
it got messed up.

> This output shows that it is "ppp0" which is your WAN port. This
> seems likely since PPP-over-Ethernet is the way in which most BSNL
> DataOne links work.
>
> This means that your outgoing port is ppp0 *not* eth0.

That is right. But do I need to mention anything for this in my LAN
machine? Currently I have set the gateway of LAN machine(s) as the LAN
ip of my gateway machine.

>
> Secondly, (but less importantly) how did you pick 192.52.x.x as your LAN
> IP address? I don't think this is a good idea. What if there is a
> machine on the internet with an address in this range to which you
> want to connect? You should only use the "LAN only" IP addresses like
> 192.168.x.x for your lan. Something like 192.168.7.x/255.255.255.0
> should be adequate for your LAN.

Yes that was a mistake. Somehow I thought 192.52.* is also a private
IP address! Now I have changed the LAN IP as 10.0.0.1. Actually in
this context it is little complex. My CentOS desktop has two private
addresses. eth0 is connected to the BSNL modem which creates the
network 192.168.1.* and eth1 is connected to LAN with the network
10.0.0.*. But when I start the pppd daemon, bsnl assigns another
dynamic public ip to eth0. So essentially eth0 will have two ip
addresses when Internet is up. But even now I am not able to solve
this problem.

Thank you for your kind response.

-- 
S.
Argue with idiots, and you become an idiot. - PG
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, email [email protected] with 
"unsubscribe <password> <address>"
in the subject or body of the message.  
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc

Reply via email to