On Friday 03 April 2009 13:15:25 Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > On Friday 03 April 2009 13:03:01 Ashok Gautham wrote: > > I find git vs mercurial to be like emacs vs vi. git has a bunch of tools > > and is like a true UNIX app. One thing per binary and that done well. > > Mercurial is a single binary that does it all. > > > > One manages Mozilla and the other the Linux kernel. So I feel both will > > suit. Much like vi and emacs again ;) > > huh?
to elaborate, I do not see any sense in this analogy. In the first place hg is an executable and not a binary. And vi is a TRUE unix app that does ONE thing well. (the one thing that it does well is confuse the users, but that is besides the point). And as for emacs - I have already made enemies of the php, mysql and ubuntu communities here. I do not want to get chandai with REAL programmers. -- regards kg http://lawgon.livejournal.com _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, email [email protected] with "unsubscribe <password> <address>" in the subject or body of the message. http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
