On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Anirudh Ranganath <[email protected]> wrote: > As far as naming goes, i personally vouch for ilugcbe, but if a majority of > contributors from Coimbatore want GLUG, we can review it. Valid arguments > for and against GNU/LINUX are given in many websites including wikipedia and > gnu's > website. However, i am personally neutral. >
Just a thought -- there are many arguments (flamewars) on Linux v/s GNU/Linux, but I've never really found any published arguments (wikipedia, gnu.org, etc.) on the subject of LUG v/s GLUG. It has always been LUG. -- Siddhesh Poyarekar http://siddhesh.in _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
