On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Anirudh Ranganath > <[email protected]> wrote: > > As far as naming goes, i personally vouch for ilugcbe, but if a majority > of > > contributors from Coimbatore want GLUG, we can review it. Valid arguments > > for and against GNU/LINUX are given in many websites including wikipedia > and > > gnu's > > website. However, i am personally neutral. > > > > Just a thought -- there are many arguments (flamewars) on Linux v/s > GNU/Linux, but I've never really found any published arguments > (wikipedia, gnu.org, etc.) on the subject of LUG v/s GLUG. It has > always been LUG. > > Not exactly. There are a few GLUGS too [1],[2]. We can say there are more LUGs than GLUGs. [1] http://www.gnu.org.in/glug-meet [2] http://www.glugot/tce.edu Anyway I don't want to involve in any more flame war here, just shared the info. -- நன்றிகளுடன், விக்னேஷ். http://krvignesh.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
