Hi Guys,

On 02/03/2011 06:39 PM, Version Control Buddy wrote:
> - As mentioned before both uses RPM internally. SUSE comes with yast
> and zypper. I have felt that zypper has more and better commandline
> options than yum. For things I had to modify the yum.conf, zypper had
> some commandline options.

Having had to use Sles a few times, I can assure you that the config 
snippets that yast puts together is just about as cool as a train wreck; 
/etc/sysconfig on rhel, on the other hand is manageable in whatever way 
you want. For new people who dont know that much about linux, and hence 
would need an 'admin panel' there are the basic system-config-<tools> 
apps which are mostly usable.

> - SUSE always tries stays with the latest packages. However RHEL does
> not. one can argue latest means it may not still be robust enough yet.

Thats not entirely true. SLES ( and not opensuse ) also does put in a 
fair emphasis on backports and trying to stick with the stable abi side 
of things. They were, after all, doing it even before RHEL came about.

- KB
_______________________________________________
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc

Reply via email to