On 8 March 2011 13:41, Arun Khan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 12:36 +0530, రహ్మానుద్దీన్ షేక్ wrote: > >> I have this requirement to setup a small lab, where we have ~30 PCs, > >> system should be the apt-cacher server. > >Having been involved in training, I used to feel the same way until I > realized that some of the students are more interested in surfing than > learning; not doing the exercises etc. and then later claiming they do > not follow the class. Blocking Internet access was the the solution. > > With the apt-cacher requirement, the OP is trying to balance the two needs. >
I am not inexperienced in training either. I refuse to train where I do not have the authority to enforce the level of discipline I specify in my classes. It is better to make the rules clear and enforce them without exception rather than reduce the learning potential. YMMV Asokan Pichai *-------------------* We will find a way. Or, make one. (Hannibal) _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
