>> or >> provide an option to boot even if it is not signed. >> > > This introduces another option that a newbie will have to change. Which, of > course, will be named *disable secure boot*. (OMG-Ubuntu rightly summarised > newbie's reaction thus: "You want me to disable a _security feature_ so I > can boot into this Linux thing?") > > >> Worst comes to worst, it shouldn't be too difficult to patch the UEFI >> firmware or replace it with an open source firmware. >> > > Ah, another barrier to Newbie. This seems to be an idea to increase the > height of Windows-Linux jump barrier, without appearing to be fully blocking > it.
I appreciate your response to my opinions but they were mere opinions on the article. It will help if we can keep the thread in the context of the article instead of focusing on someone's opinions. -- 0 _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
