>
> That's why RMS has been insisting on giving importance to *freedom* than
> the other technical aspects. Now we are in a sorry state that even a "FOSS
> enthusiast" in a LUG has forgotten the whole point of Free software and is
> advocating for using M$ product on "Linux".
>

I don't think *freedom* means anti-proprietary. Even though it might 
advocate the use of free software over proprietary software, I don't 
think it intends to ban the usage of proprietary software. To give an 
example, NVIDIA provides its proprietary drivers for Linux and I use it 
because it works best for my hardware. So, the first thing I do after 
installation is nuke nouveau. This does not mean I have forgotten the 
point of free software.

IMHO, If someone wants to use a proprietary product with FOSS, so be it, 
denying this right to him/her would indeed be against the FOSS philosophy.

-- 
0
_______________________________________________
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc

Reply via email to