On 6 August 2012 14:12, Girish Venkatachalam
<[email protected]> wrote:

> I dunno how to prove that UNIX is better than Linux.
> Lot of people simply don't understand it.
> And they cannot understand it.

You can. You just have to learn it.

> As a systems administrator if you set your sight very low at any rate
> you cannot understand much because your target itself is so low.

Oh, common. What is wrong with being a systems administrator and how
is it in anyway inferior to any other IT job?

> 1) Linux has bad file systems, it is a fragmented world with many
> distros, even kernel is not standard. Many commercial people like Redhat has 
> spoilt the charm
>
> 2) There are too many ways to do the same thing. No agreement, too many egos 
> to
>  satisfy and the project is being pulled in too many directions as
> finding consensus when
>  there are too many interests is hard. Even in things like epoll or
> inotify or udev or whatever
>
> 3)Linux is not an OS. It uses the GNU toolchain, bash and other
> userland from GNU project
>  and only the kernel is maintained. A distro puts together all these
> and does package management
>  like RPM, DEB etc.
>
> 4) Linux is immature and a kid compared to UNIX as it does not have
> ftp, ssh or make  or gcc or
>  gdb in base install. The very spirit of UNIX and engineer mindset is
> lost in trying to make it
>  everything for everybody
>
> 5) I can go on and on and on ;)
>
> Now UNIX is what started it all when Dennis Ritchie and Kernighan
> wrote C to write UNIX.
>
> Those brains had some vision and values behind what an OS should be.
>
> Today OpenBSD is the only OS that upholds that spirit and resists
> rampant commercialism.
>
> The key difference between Linux and UNIX is that UNIX is one single thing.
>
> By FreeBSD people know what it is. It is one single thing. There are
> not 1000 distros in FreeBSD.
>
> It is a combination of entire userland , kernel and base system.
>
> All source code is maintained and audited in a single repository.
>
> You can get the source code of entire toolchain used to create an OS
> including X.
>
> In short it is the lack of commercial interests and proper team
> management, leadership
>  and focus that creates a good quality OS suitable for engineering purposes.


You have left me thoroughly confused half of the above is false and
the rest of them are irrelevant. Sorry for being rude.

--
Y
_______________________________________________
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc

Reply via email to