> You are right about the problem happening but ...
>
> I may be wrong, but i dont think the order of deny
> statement vis-a-vis
> allow statement matters here. What matter here the
> the order specified
> in the "Order" statement.
Thats what i had said. Ok had maid a typo in writing
"Order" directive as simply order.
=====
#####
#####
#######
# # #
#" #" #
Linux ##vvvvv##
Rules! ## vvv ##
# ##
## ##
### ###
+++##### ##++
++++++# #++++++
+++++++# #+++++++
+++++#######+++++
+++ +++
Message void if penguin violated
Don't mess with the penguin
Disclamer
The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The distinction is
yours to draw...
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
_______________________________________________
ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
