--- Amit Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so u think LTSP for 30 users are not a good choice,
> right? VK says its not a good idea, u think same.
Hey Amit! when did i said its not a good idea, i just
cautioned you. I know the kind of machuines you have
got in your office (if you haven't changed the job)
and i belive you have clinet machines which can handle
linux ;-) at most you might require to upgrade the RAM
in some machines. Given this, it would be easier for
you to maintain the seprate linux installation then
going for LTSP. Remember LTSP has its advantages as
well as restrictions too.
Not to offend anyone, i belive LTSP is useful when
you want to recycle old hardware or if you want dumb
terminals for not so intelligent users or you want to
have complete control over which softwares your end
users are using(like cyber cafes).
So take a call yourself to go for LTSP or standalone
installations!!!!
Regards
VK
=====
I was born Intelligent, but EDUCATION Ruined me.
Disclamer
The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The distinction is
yours to draw...
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush
_______________________________________________
ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
