> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Rahul Upakare > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 10:21 AM > To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list > Subject: Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux > > Also, if you are familiar with Windows you can use Linux, but if you > are addicted to > Windows then you cannot.
Its not a question of addiction. It's a matter of habit. Gabbar Singh equates to Amjad Khan and not to Amitabh Bachchan what Ram Gopal Varma is trying to do. He's fighting a losing battle. I went OT here. But this is the best example I could think of as I am also a movie buff. If you can't imagine anyone else but Amjad Khan as Gabbar Singh, then try changing the world from Windows to Linux on the desktop. The server battle is already won. Want more examples ? Try replacing Prithviraj Kapoor as Emperor Akbar in Mughal-e-Azam or Madhubala as Anarkali or Dilip Kumar as Prince Salim. It's just not going to work. Due apologies to the listadmin for going way too OT here. > > It is just a matter of time. Time changes everything. How much time are we talking of here. Microsoft released Windows 95 in 1995. They predicted that all PC's will be manufactured with pre-loaded Windows. Now we are in 2007. Red Hat came out with their 6.2 version in 1999 if I am not mistaken. Everyone dubbed it as the best and stable release then. Improvements kept happening on that over a period of time. We are now in 2007. How much will it take to change things. Microsoft released Vista in January 2007. It is June now. All PC's that are coming out from factories have Vista on them or with a Vista ready sticker. I am not writing this in favour of Microsoft. It's just plain facts and the reality out there. Cheers, Surjo. _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
