On 15-Dec-07, at 9:38 AM, Raj Mathur wrote: > Don't you think you're overly trivialising the issue? By your > logic, no > one would ever be able to use the phrase ``agree to disagree'' in any > copyrighted work after its first use in a copyrighted work. That just > sounds so... wrong.
there is a small difference between using the phrase 'agree to disagree' in a 300 page original creative work and asserting copyright to the work and using the same phrase in a one-liner and asserting copyright to that one line. Of course, it is a very trivial and minor difference. > > BTW, you don't need to CC me replies -- I'm subscribed to the list and > do get replies to my mails there too. I didn't cc you - you have set reply-to as: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected], so *you* appear to be cc-ing yourself. (this sentence is released under the terms of GPL version 4, and may be reproduced under the condition that the full text of GPL v4 is attached to the reproduction) -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves Associate, NRC-FOSS [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/ Foss conference for the common man: http://registration.fossconf.in/web/ _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22/23, 2008 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
