Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > redhat 5 had a package manager - yes, graphical. It had linuxconf - > from setting up aliases to ethernet cards, users blah blah. Great
Too bad it does not install on modern day hardware :D Also, you seem to think Linuxconf from those days was the best way to do things ? I haveto disagree. Linuxconf was a piece of crap software, badly written and hard to manage or even hack your own stuff into. So much so that its been more than once abandoned by its authors. > gui. Actually it was 5.2 that had all the goodies. It ran on 32 MB > RAM. And it ran wordperfect 5.1 perfectly under dosemu. It had a real I have, just like pretty much most of the world, no use for Wordperfect. > good filemanager -yes, better than windows explorer. I have the cds, > so if you want to come and verify it - be my guest. Compared to what window manager ? Can it compete in a user experience to todays Windows ? Or are you still living in a time warp and only want to compare notes with what 'has been' ? -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ GnuPG Public Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22/23, 2008 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
