On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:44 PM, devesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Lets talk about Hindi, first: > I have completed my study up to 10th standard in 'Hindi only' and i had not > seen a computer before/till 10th. After completion of my B.Tech in > Computers, I didn't find any reason to code in 'Hindi'. May I be wrong?
Because you can write in english very well and that`s shown by your email *YOU ARE NOT TARGET AUDIENCE OF HINDAWI* > > So, I must say we should take these two things in two different ways. > However I have no hard feeling towards 'Localization', in fact, I have been > working on Urdu Localization(from JMI/Sarai). > > Now lets observe the facts: > Case 1. When both medium and technology are in 'English'. (people are local) > Work-done = work (to understand the medium) + work ( to > understand the technology) > Throughput = most/??? > Time = lesser > > Case 2. When medium is 'local' and technology is in 'English'. (people are > local) > Work-done = work ( to understand the technology) > Throughput = most/lesser > Time = least > > Case 3. When both are 'local' > Work-done = work (to convert the technology into 'local' medium) > + work ( to understand the technology) > Throughput = ???/most > Time = most > > Note : Case '3' will behave like case '1' after some 'effort'. > Hmm, Can i have a pointer somewhere for the authenticity of this case study ? -- Thanks and Regards Gaurav Mishra Linux User #348873 http://gauravmishra.info/blog "When i can run , i will run , When i can walk , i will walk, When i can crawl , i will crawl. But i will not stop moving forward" _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
