On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sandip Bhattacharya wrote: >> You don't seem to have understood my question. What exactly are you >> implying is close sourced? A piece of software that is being >> distributed or otherwise commercially sold? Or the code behind a >> service that is being commercially exploited? > > you guys really need to start looking at stuff before commenting on it. > if you really dont know what launchpad is, a bit of research would be > well in order. eg, components that went into launchpad, and are used > elsewhere in canonical's projects still remain closed source. A simple 5 > min google for 'launchpad open source' would give you plenty of foo to > roost over, even looking at the wikipedia page for launchpad and its > talk pages should have some info for you. > > --
Did you googled the "Keywords" before writing them down here :P "launchpad open source" , Brings these results http://arstechnica.com/journals/linux.ars/2008/07/23/mark-shuttleworth-launchpad-to-be-open-source-in-12-months http://www.ubuntu.com/news/storm-python-orm-open-sourced -- Thanks and Regards Gaurav Mishra Linux User #348873 http://gauravmishra.info/blog "When i can run , i will run , When i can walk , i will walk, When i can crawl , i will crawl. But i will not stop moving forward" _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
