On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Raj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday-ji 01 Oct-ji 2008, Swapnil-ji Bhartiya-ji wrote: >> [snip] >> Previous mail of Raj, Manoj ji, Karan Ji, then Sandeep > > I find it grossly unfair that neither Sandip nor I rate a ``ji'', > specially considering that I'm older that the other three (Manoj, KB > and Sandip) put together. I'll even settle for ``Raj bhaiyya'' if you > find the idea of calling me ``ji'' nauseating (as I do). Sandip can be > ``-da''.
Probably, "ji" is used only for the "contributors" and you may not be in that category according to various definitions and standards and references discussed in this thread ;-) using "da" will start another thread and another flame war about TM and SM for "da" and/or "ji" :-)) -Sudhanwa ~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~~ www.sudhanwa.com _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
