M.S.Yatnatti CEO KPN UNLIMITD wrote:
> Dear Harish PIllay
> I am educating myself about  four kinds of freedom, for the users of the 
> software as per GPL .Freedom  number two Redhat does not  want to give user  
> for RHEL Linux Distribution .The
> freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbour (freedom
> 2).

Mr Yatnatti, if you feel so strongly about an issue you dont either 
understand, not have done any research on, I would highly recommend you 
speak to a laywer and take the matter to court. Ranting on a list about 
what you envisage is a GPL violation isnt going to help at all.

Also, I've stayed away from this conversation so far as a matter of 
interest. However, this is just getting silly. I think Sudhanwa hit the 
nail on the head with his post. Yatnatti does not know or comprehend the 
difference between Copyright, Trademark, Licensing or the ethos of Open 
Source.

Disclaimer: I am a member of the CentOS Devteam
-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/
GnuPG Public Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

_______________________________________________
ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to