[there is no sane way I could unwrap the word wrap in this mail - apologies in advance]
M.S.Yatnatti CEO KPN UNLIMITD wrote: > I really unable to understand why my mails in the list are cobbling.Don't > worry about that . In few days I shall have document neatly typed in very > proper manner..Do you thinkh that we don't need GPL� any more or GPL is > strong , which can defend the internal and external threats.Is it illegal to > redistribute RHEL? if so why? Under what provision of trademark law� Redhat > claims the copyrights and where it has registered the copyrights for RHEL. > Does it own RHEL..How redhat is GPL compliant.Fedora is upstream and open > gate when it flow down stream in the name of RHEL its gate are shut.which is� > derived version of Fedora becomes owned by Redhat under trademarks. Your > views might be diffrent than others .Please let me know your views only .Let > us know your logic. It appears that you have exhausted the response pool of the list. If so, while you are typing out all the points raised by you, would it also be possible for you to visit http://www.redhat.com/legal/legal_statement.html (unless you have already done so) along with http://www.redhat.com/about/companyprofile/trademark/ and http://www.redhat.com/legal/legal_statement.html#claim http://www.redhat.com/about/contact/ would provide you more information. It is always a good idea to attempt to contact the vendor, as opposed to a general list about questions on a vendor's product. -- http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literature digitally re-published http://www.plos.org - Public Library of Science http://www.creativecommons.org - Flexible copyright for creative work _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
