M.S.Yatnatti CEO KPN UNLIMITD wrote: > Thanks for your response. I > did not asked you to provide me what red hat says in its websites .As > you have forwarded me the list. I need your views on the topic .Your logic.
I am pretty much surprised as to why you are so eager to obtain, collect, collate and perhaps annotate everybody's views without asking the party-in-question their views or perspective (assuming that you have started this thread with the basic assumption that the responses in LFY were incomplete). One of the URLs provide you a means to contact Red Hat's Counsels. I'd strongly suggest that you do that as well. Creating a volume of traffic on a mailing list on an issue that a majority believe to be resolved generally points to either [i] you are being unclear about the fundamentals of trademarks, copyrights or GPL or, [ii] you are eager to get Google juice to your site via trolling -- http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literature digitally re-published http://www.plos.org - Public Library of Science http://www.creativecommons.org - Flexible copyright for creative work _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
