On 11/07/2012 04:19 PM, Balwinder S Dheeman wrote: > On 11/07/2012 03:38 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> On 11/07/2012 07:38 AM, Sandeep wrote: >>>> Why not YATE, http://yate.null.ro/; Yate is modular, efficiently >>>> programmed in C++ from scratch and much more stable even the >>>> svn/development version works out from the box. >>>> >>> Well, I'll confess that this is the first time that I have heard about >>> Yate. I >> That makes two of us, >> >> having had a look around, it does not appear to have had any sort of >> code audit. I'd be keen on keeping an eye out for that ( or even >> instigating one ) > Please do check: <http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.telephony.yate/6082> > > It is not a fork of Asterisk like the OpenPBX.org which eventually > turned into FreeSWICH; whereas the FreeSWITCH again is a completely > re-written alternative. > > I do not intend to initiate a war; but am talking about FLOSS > (Free/Libre Open Source) alternatives; forget to mention the FreeSWITCH > in my earlier post, indeed. > > IMHO, All these, the Asterisk, the FreeSWITCH and the Yate fulfill > difference design goals, but almost same functionality while one of > these might be more suitable for a particular scenario and, or environment.
See also: <http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2008-July/004606.html> -- Balwinder S "bdheeman" Dheeman (http://werc.homelinux.net/contact/) _______________________________________________ Ilugd mailing list [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
