>>>>> "Sandip" == Sandip Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sandip> Muskan is now a loving member of my killfile. Consider
Sandip> doing the same. Now that I have stopped getting his mails,
Sandip> it is a PITA if I still get to see it in other's forwarded
Sandip> mails, especially of people whose mails I do always read!
Sandip> :(
Sandip> I repeat - there is no point of banning people on the
Sandip> list. If you dont like the poster: - killfile - ignore
Sandip> mails - delete before reading/opening (works wonderfully
Sandip> with IMAP) - send goons/Shiv Sainiks/Bajrang Dal to
Sandip> his/her house - Ask him to meet you sometime in late
Sandip> evening, preferably alone. Carry some blunt instrument for
Sandip> the meeting.
I don't believe individual killfiles are the solution for a global
problem. I'm taking this opportunity to recommend removing Muskan
from the list to Nishikant. What do you say, Nishikant?
Tolerance is fine, but you also have to draw the line somewhere, and
my personal tolerance shouldn't go around reducing the signal to noise
ratio on the list so much that other members leave it in disgust.
Regards,
-- Raju
Sandip> But there is no point in further discussing people whom
Sandip> you do not want to hear about on the list. Messes up our
Sandip> strategy of dealing with the problem i.e. one of the above
Sandip> choices.
Sandip> - Sandip
Sandip> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 05:59:50PM +0530, Ambar Roy spoke
Sandip> out thus:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> This is getting extremely irritating now... when will muskan
>> get banned from this list???
--
Raju Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/
It is the mind that moves
================================================
To subscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subscribe in subject header
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in subject header
Archives are available at http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd%40wpaa.org
=================================================
